Why good leaders explain their decisions

The less you explain, the more people invent

Two men discussing paperwork across a desk in a workplace.

When a decision affects people, “Because I said so” usually isn’t enough. That doesn’t mean everybody gets a vote, and it doesn’t mean every decision has to be defended forever.

Sometimes I’ve listened, made the call, and we’re moving on. I can still tell people what I was trying to accomplish and why I chose that option. If I don’t, people fill in the blank themselves.

A new procedure must be punishment for somebody. A change in enforcement must be about a complaint. The chief must have some hidden reason. Sometimes the explanation people invent is a lot more interesting than the real one, and that’s partly on me if I gave them nothing else to work with.

I’ve been on both sides of this. I’ve looked at somebody else’s decision and wondered how they came up with it. Then I became responsible for making decisions with information I couldn’t share, limited options, or several answers I didn’t particularly like.

Subscribe to Field Notes

The stories and ideas I don’t want you to miss.

It didn’t teach me that the boss is always right. It taught me that the person looking at the final decision may only be seeing part of what went into it. So when I can, I try to explain the problem I was trying to solve, why I didn’t choose another option, and what I expect the decision to accomplish.

People may hear all of that and still think I made the wrong call. Fine. At least we’re disagreeing about the decision I actually made, not one they had to invent.

Sometimes I can’t share the details. Personnel matters, active investigations, and privacy concerns put real limits on what I can say. But “I can’t tell you everything” and “I can’t tell you anything” aren’t always the same thing.

Usually I can explain some of the reasoning without sharing information that should stay private. That helps me too. If I can’t put into words what problem I was trying to solve or why this option made sense, I may need to think it through again.

And if the decision turns out to be wrong, explaining it doesn’t mean I have to defend it forever. New information can change the answer. I’d rather explain what I believed at the time, say what I learned, and pivot than protect a bad decision just because I already announced it.

People aren’t going to agree with every decision I make, and I don’t expect them to. I just don’t want them guessing what I was thinking when I could tell them.

SHARE
|

Subscribe to Field Notes

The stories and ideas I don’t want you to miss.

You Also Might Like

  • Humanoid robot pointing to paperwork as a supervisor reviews and signs documents across from an employee.

    When human review becomes a rubber stamp

  • Police officer sitting beside a packed box in a locker room, considering leaving the job.

    Sometimes quitting is the responsible career decision

  • Two patrol officers talking beside a marked police car after a routine call, representing police partnership and trust built during ordinary shifts.

    What End of Watch understands about partnership

  • A police officer talks with four people beside a black Chevrolet Tahoe at a crowded outdoor field party at night.

    Twenty years of experience or one year repeated twenty times?

  • Police employee reviews license plate search records while a supervisor examines an audit log.

    If one employee can abuse a police system 2,700 times, that’s not just an employee problem

  • A white humanoid robot sits on a throne flanked by robot guards while a group of people gathers below.

    They put the AI in charge before it was ready